Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an additional ground of appeal, not raised before the lower authorities or in the return, could be admitted at the Tribunal stage and, if admitted, whether the matter should be sent back for consideration by the first appellate authority.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the controversy was covered by binding authority of the jurisdictional High Court on facts materially identical to the present case. On that footing, it accepted that the assessee could raise the additional ground before the Tribunal notwithstanding its omission earlier. Since the point had not been examined by the Commissioner (Appeals), the Tribunal considered it appropriate to remit the issue for decision at that stage, with reference to the Tribunal's earlier view for the preceding assessment year.
Conclusion: The additional ground was admitted, and the matter was remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of admission of the additional ground and consequential remand, leaving the substantive deduction claim to be decided by the Commissioner (Appeals).