Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether distributions received by the assessee from discretionary trusts were assessable only in the hands of the trustees under section 164 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and not in the hands of the assessee.
Analysis: The question had earlier been answered by the High Court in favour of the assessee, but the governing principle was held to be covered by the decision in CIT v. Kamalini Khatau. On that basis, the earlier view could not be sustained and the proper legal position was that the distributions were not assessable only in the hands of the trustees.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.