Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1988 (2) TMI 92 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal overturns disallowance of R&D expenditure, orders reassessment &D The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of research and development expenditure under Section 35, directing reassessment of ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal overturns disallowance of R&D expenditure, orders reassessment &D

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of research and development expenditure under Section 35, directing reassessment of depreciation on capital expenditure for research and development, and adjusting interest charges as per relief granted.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance of expenditure on research and development under Section 35.
                            2. Denial of depreciation on capital expenditure for research and development.
                            3. Charging of interest under Section 139(8) and Section 217.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance of Expenditure on Research and Development Under Section 35:

                            The first ground of appeal concerns the disallowance of Rs. 15,83,209 on account of research and development expenditure claimed under Section 35. The assessee, a corporation set up to promote and develop electronic industries in U.P., argued that the expenditure was for business purposes and hence deductible. The assessing officer denied this claim, stating that the corporation derived income from other sources like interest and dividends, and not from business activities. The officer also noted that the scientific research was not related to the business carried on by the assessee. The CIT(A) upheld this view, asserting that the subsidiary companies were independent units and the research did not relate to the business of the assessee corporation.

                            The assessee contended that Section 35 allows deductions for scientific research, even if the research results are used by subsidiaries. The assessee emphasized that the main object of the corporation was to promote electronic industries, which inherently involved research and development. The assessee cited the Bombay High Court decision in CIT v. National Rayon Corpn. Ltd., which allowed similar deductions under Section 35(1)(i).

                            Upon review, the Tribunal found substantial merit in the assessee's arguments. The memorandum of association clearly outlined the corporation's objective to promote and develop the electronics industry, including research and development activities. The Tribunal held that the expenditure on scientific research was indeed related to the business of the assessee and was therefore deductible under Section 35. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee was recognized by the Department of Science and Technology, which further supported the claim. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the claim of the assessee.

                            2. Denial of Depreciation on Capital Expenditure for Research and Development:

                            The second issue was the denial of depreciation on the capital expenditure of Rs. 15,83,209 used for research and development. The CIT(A) dismissed this claim, arguing that the assessee did not carry on research and development for its own benefit or as a commercial unit.

                            The Tribunal, however, linked this issue to the first one. Since the Tribunal had accepted that the assessee was entitled to the benefits under Section 35, it logically followed that depreciation on the plant and machinery used for research and development should also be allowed. The Tribunal directed the assessing officer to reassess the depreciation claim, ensuring that all prerequisite conditions were met and providing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

                            3. Charging of Interest Under Section 139(8) and Section 217:

                            The final issue was the charging of interest under Section 139(8) and Section 217. The CIT(A) referred to a decision of the Allahabad High Court and directed the assessing officer to allow reductions in interest charges corresponding to any relief granted in the appellate order.

                            The Tribunal found no need for further directions on this matter, as the CIT(A)'s instructions were clear and adequate.

                            Conclusion:

                            In summary, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, granting relief on all contested grounds. The disallowance of research and development expenditure was overturned, depreciation on related capital expenditure was to be reassessed, and interest charges were to be adjusted in line with the reliefs granted.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found