Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner was justified in revising the assessment under section 263 on the ground that excise duty relatable to finished goods lying in bonded warehouse had to be included in the valuation of closing stock under section 145A.
Analysis: The assessment records showed that the assessee had included in closing stock the excise duty actually paid on goods removed from the warehouse, while no duty had been paid on goods still lying in bonded warehouse. Section 145A requires valuation to be adjusted to include taxes, duties, cess or fee actually paid or incurred to bring the goods to the place of location and condition as on the valuation date. Reading the excise provisions, duty becomes payable on removal from the place of removal or approved storage, and until such removal the assessee is not liable to pay the duty. Since the duty on goods in bonded warehouse had neither accrued as payable nor been actually paid or incurred, it could not be added to closing stock. The Commissioner's view that such duty was necessarily includible was therefore not correct, and on that basis the assessment could not be treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue.
Conclusion: The revision under section 263 was not sustainable, and the assessee succeeded.