1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal upholds assessment of income ownership in Thakkar case, dismisses Revenue appeals</h1> In a case concerning the assessment of Smt. B.G. Thakkar and the clubbing of income from Rupa Textile Engineers in the hands of her husband, Shri G.R. ... - Issues Involved:1. Assessment of Smt. Bhartiben Ghanshyambhai on a protective basis and clubbing of income from Rupa Textile Engineers in the hands of her husband, Shri Ghanshyambhai R. Thakkar.2. Deletion of Rs. 60,000 as bad debt in the case of Shri G.R. Thakkar.Summary:Issue 1: Assessment of Smt. Bhartiben Ghanshyambhai and Clubbing of IncomeIn ITA No. 4060/Ahd/1990, the matter pertains to the assessment of Smt. Bhartiben Ghanshyambhai (B.G. Thakkar) on a protective basis and clubbing of income from Rupa Textile Engineers ('Rupa') in the hands of her husband, Shri Ghanshyambhai R. Thakkar (G.R. Thakkar). The AO conducted a survey operation u/s 133A at the office premises and found that G.R. Thakkar was managing the business of Rupa, although it was in the name of his wife. Both Smt. B.G. Thakkar and G.R. Thakkar admitted that the business activities were managed by G.R. Thakkar and agreed to club the income from Rupa in his hands. However, the Dy. CIT(A) reversed the AO's decision and directed the assessment of Smt. B.G. Thakkar on a substantive basis. The Tribunal upheld the Dy. CIT(A)'s order, noting that the business of Rupa was genuine and had been assessed as such in previous years. The Tribunal found that Smt. B.G. Thakkar was the real owner of Rupa and not her husband, thus making the clubbing of income unjustified.Issue 2: Deletion of Rs. 60,000 as Bad DebtIn ITA No. 4059/Ahd/1990, concerning Shri G.R. Thakkar, the AO had clubbed Rs. 29,910 as income from Rupa in his hands, which the Dy. CIT(A) deleted, holding that Smt. B.G. Thakkar was the real owner of Rupa. Consistent with the decision in ITA No. 4060/Ahd/1990, the Tribunal upheld the Dy. CIT(A)'s decision. Additionally, the AO had disallowed Rs. 60,000 as bad debt due to lack of details. However, the Dy. CIT(A) deleted this addition after examining the details and finding that the debt pertained to M/s Indequip Engineering Ltd., which had gone into liquidation. The Tribunal upheld the Dy. CIT(A)'s order, finding it justified.Conclusion:Both appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, upholding the Dy. CIT(A)'s orders in favor of Smt. B.G. Thakkar and Shri G.R. Thakkar.