Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the foreign tour expenditure incurred for a director could be treated as a taxable gift to the director under the Gift-tax Act. (ii) Whether the write-off of amounts paid and spent in connection with premises acquired for the business could be treated as a taxable gift to the lessor.
Issue (i): Whether the foreign tour expenditure incurred for a director could be treated as a taxable gift to the director under the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The director was on the board at the time of the tour, and the fact that the expenditure had been disallowed in income-tax proceedings did not by itself establish that the company intended to make a gift. The absence of material showing that the tour expenditure represented a transfer made otherwise than for business purposes meant that the gift-tax authorities could not treat the amount as a gift merely because the claim was not accepted under the Income-tax Act.
Conclusion: The amount was not a taxable gift and gift-tax was not attracted.
Issue (ii): Whether the write-off of amounts paid and spent in connection with premises acquired for the business could be treated as a taxable gift to the lessor.
Analysis: Section 5(1)(xiv) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 exempts a gift made in the course of business if it is proved to have been made bona fide for the purpose of such business. The company had entered into the arrangement for business considerations, the premises were taken for a limited period, and the cancellation and write-off were linked to the business relationship and the services rendered by the general manager. The fact that the corresponding expenditure was not allowable under income-tax principles did not compel the conclusion that the write-off was not bona fide for business purposes.
Conclusion: The write-off did not amount to a taxable gift and gift-tax was not attracted.
Final Conclusion: The gift-tax assessments on both items were unsustainable, and the assessee succeeded in full.
Ratio Decidendi: A benefit or write-off will not be treated as a taxable gift if, on the surrounding circumstances, it is shown to have been made bona fide for the purposes of business; disallowance under income-tax law does not automatically establish liability to gift-tax.