TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether exemption under section 5(1)(ivc) of the Wealth-tax Act could be withdrawn on the footing that title in the tenements passed to the purchasers under the hire purchase arrangement. (ii) Whether reopening of the assessments under section 17(1)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act was valid in the absence of material or information.
Issue (i): Whether exemption under section 5(1)(ivc) of the Wealth-tax Act could be withdrawn on the footing that title in the tenements passed to the purchasers under the hire purchase arrangement.
Analysis: The exemption turned on whether the assessee's interest in the tenements had ceased to be ownership merely because possession had been handed over under a hire purchase arrangement. The Tribunal held that an agreement to sell or a hire purchase arrangement, by itself, does not transfer title to immovable property worth more than the statutory limit unless there is a registered conveyance. Receipt of instalments and delivery of possession did not divest the vendor of title, and the doctrine of part performance had only limited application. The tenements were therefore not treated as having passed out of the assessee's ownership for the purpose of the wealth-tax exemption.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of exemption under section 5(1)(ivc) was unjustified and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Issue (ii): Whether reopening of the assessments under section 17(1)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act was valid in the absence of material or information.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the reopening was unsupported by any basis or information before the Wealth-tax Officer. In the absence of material indicating escapement of wealth, the statutory condition for invoking reassessment jurisdiction was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The reopening under section 17(1)(b) was invalid and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed on both the exemption issue and the reassessment issue, and the assessee's relief granted by the first appellate authority was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Title to immovable property is not transferred by a hire purchase arrangement or possession alone without a registered conveyance, and reassessment cannot be initiated under section 17(1)(b) without material or information supporting escapement.
TaxTMI 
