TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the land acquired by the Government was agricultural land; (ii) whether the assessee, being a Hindu undivided family, was entitled to the benefit of section 54B.
Issue (i): Whether the land acquired by the Government was agricultural land.
Analysis: The land had earlier been treated as agricultural in the wealth-tax proceedings, and the same land was under consideration. Applying the tests governing the character of land and keeping in view the accepted treatment of the property in the connected proceedings, the land was found to be agricultural land.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee, being a Hindu undivided family, was entitled to the benefit of section 54B.
Analysis: Section 54B grants relief where the capital asset is land used by the assessee or a parent for agricultural purposes and the assessee purchases other agricultural land within the prescribed period. The Court held that an HUF cannot have a parent in the statutory sense and that the language of section 54B, read with the analogous interpretation of section 54, confines the relief to an individual assessee and not an HUF.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The land was held to be agricultural, but the capital gains exemption under section 54B was denied to the HUF, so the appeal succeeded only in part.
Ratio Decidendi: Relief under section 54B is available only to an individual assessee and not to a Hindu undivided family.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
