1986 (4) TMI 83 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT rules in favor of assessee, overturns Rs. 10,000 addition by tax authorities

The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad-C ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the Rs. 10,000 addition made by the IT authorities. The Tribunal found ... - Issues:- Extra profit addition of Rs. 10,000 by IT authorities.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad-C centered around the sole issue of the IT authorities' additional profit addition of Rs. 10,000. The assessee, a firm engaged in the diamond business, had disclosed sales of diamonds and commissions from diamond cutting and polishing for the relevant assessment year. The IT authorities made the lump sum addition based on the lack of complete quantity tally of diamonds and inability to prove the value of closing stock. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, citing a fall in gross profit on majuri receipts and unverifiable majuri payments as reasons for the estimated addition.The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition, arguing that the CIT(A) did not specify which majuri payments were unverifiable and did not provide an opportunity for explanation. The assessee presented detailed trading account information and payment records to support their case. The Department representative supported the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the validity of the reasons given for the addition.Upon reviewing the submissions and evidence, the Tribunal found merit in the assessee's arguments. It noted that the lump sum addition lacked specific details of unverifiable majuri payments and was based on a minor decrease in the gross profit rate on majuri receipts. The Tribunal concluded that the addition was unjustified, especially considering the consistent maintenance of accounts by the assessee over the years. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the Rs. 10,000 addition from the total income.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the Rs. 10,000 addition. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing specific justifications for additions and maintaining consistent accounting practices to support income assessments.