Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on U.V. lamp, fluorescent tube and U.V. radiating tube used as parts of a printing machine, notwithstanding their individual classification.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal noted that the earlier view denying credit had not considered the Board's clarification dated 2-12-1996, which stated that components, parts, spares and accessories of specified goods are eligible irrespective of classification. Since the printing machine was specified goods, its component parts also qualified for credit. The contrary earlier decision was held to be incorrect in law.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible on the disputed goods.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed, with Modvat credit granted to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Components, parts, spares and accessories of specified capital goods are eligible for credit under Rule 57Q even if their individual tariff classification would otherwise fall outside the specified heading.