Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2002 (10) TMI 222 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trust deed limits and AOP taxation: partial corpus transfers may be unauthorised, and joint recipients can be taxed as an association. A trustee must act strictly within the trust deed: where the instrument requires the whole corpus to be dealt with in a prescribed manner, a partial ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Trust deed limits and AOP taxation: partial corpus transfers may be unauthorised, and joint recipients can be taxed as an association.

                            A trustee must act strictly within the trust deed: where the instrument requires the whole corpus to be dealt with in a prescribed manner, a partial distribution on restrictive terms is beyond authority and inconsistent with the Indian Trusts Act. The text also explains that, for tax purposes, the label used by the parties is not decisive; if individuals voluntarily combine to hold and enjoy property and derive income jointly, they may be treated as an association of persons. On this analysis, the income remains assessable in the hands of the trust when the corpus transfer is invalid, and the recipients may be taxed at the maximum marginal rate where the statutory conditions for AOP treatment are met.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the trustees could validly distribute only a part of the trust corpus to two beneficiaries on terms of joint tenancy and survivorship, and whether the resulting income was taxable in the hands of the trust or the beneficiaries; (ii) Whether the recipients, though described as a body of individuals, were liable to be assessed as an association of persons at the maximum marginal rate.

                            Issue (i): Whether the trustees could validly distribute only a part of the trust corpus to two beneficiaries on terms of joint tenancy and survivorship, and whether the resulting income was taxable in the hands of the trust or the beneficiaries.

                            Analysis: The trust deed required distribution of the entire corpus only on expiry of the stipulated period or an earlier period duly decided by the trustees, and permitted use of corpus only for specified objects such as health, education, maintenance, marriage expenses and advancement in life. The trustees did not exercise a power to advance the distribution of the whole corpus but attempted a partial distribution with restrictive conditions, thereby altering the trust scheme and creating a trust upon a trust. The power of a trustee is confined to the mandate of the settlement, and a trustee cannot do less where the deed directs the whole to be dealt with in a prescribed manner. The attempted transfer of part of the corpus to a separate body with joint ownership conditions was beyond the trustees' authority and inconsistent with the trust deed and the Indian Trusts Act.

                            Conclusion: The partial distribution of corpus was invalid, and the income remained assessable in the hands of the trust.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the recipients, though described as a body of individuals, were liable to be assessed as an association of persons at the maximum marginal rate.

                            Analysis: The arrangement showed conscious and voluntary joining of persons to hold and enjoy the transferred property and to derive income jointly. The statutory concept of association of persons is wider than the label used by the parties and is not confined to a company or co-operative society. Where individuals combine in a joint enterprise to produce income, the status may be that of an association of persons for tax purposes. On the facts, the recipients were engaged in a common venture with determinate collective ownership and enjoyment, bringing them within the taxing provision applicable to associations of persons with indeterminate shares.

                            Conclusion: The recipients were assessable as an association of persons, and tax at the maximum marginal rate was correctly applied.

                            Final Conclusion: The attempted partial corpus distribution was ultra vires the trust deed, and the alternative assessment in the hands of the recipients was sustainable only at the maximum marginal rate under the applicable tax provision.

                            Ratio Decidendi: A trustee must act strictly within the mandate of the trust deed and cannot effect a partial disposition that is not authorised where the instrument requires distribution of the whole corpus in the prescribed manner; where persons voluntarily combine to hold and enjoy property and earn income jointly, the taxing statute may treat them as an association of persons notwithstanding the label of body of individuals.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found