Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing the capital of a company under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the general reserve could be reduced by the difference between depreciation allowed under the Income-tax Act and depreciation provided in the books of account.
Analysis: The computation of surtax proceeds on distinct statutory components: chargeable profits under the First Schedule, capital under the Second Schedule, and the rate under the Third Schedule. For capital computation, only the adjustments expressly permitted by Rule 1 of the Second Schedule can be made. The assessee's reserve was created out of profits after tax, and the Second Schedule contained no provision authorising a reduction of reserves merely because the depreciation allowed in income-tax assessment exceeded the depreciation shown in the books. The earlier Calcutta decision was distinguished because it turned on a different factual setting and on Explanation 1 to Rule 2 of the Second Schedule, which was not applicable here. The decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court supported the view that reserves created out of post-tax profits fall within "other reserves" and are includible in capital.
Conclusion: The general reserve could not be reduced by the difference between the depreciation allowed under the Income-tax Act and the depreciation provided in the books. The adjustment made by the revenue authorities was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: Capital under the Second Schedule must be computed strictly according to the adjustments expressly provided therein, and a reserve created from post-tax profits cannot be diminished by an unexpressed depreciation differential.
Ratio Decidendi: The Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 is an exhaustive code for capital computation, and reserves created out of post-tax profits cannot be reduced except by an adjustment specifically authorised by that Schedule.