Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's refund for assessment year 1997-98 had been validly adjusted against the earlier demand for assessment year 1992-93 before the declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, and whether the assessee was therefore entitled to refund and interest.
Analysis: The statutory adjustment of refund under section 245 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is mandatory and requires prior intimation to the assessee; without such intimation and an opportunity to object, the adjustment is bad in law. The certificate issued under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme is conclusive and cannot be reopened except for a false declaration or an obvious patent error. On the record, the Department continued to pursue the 1992-93 demand without showing a prior adjustment of the 1997-98 refund, which supported the assessee's case that no valid adjustment had been made. The claim for interest under section 244A follows the statutory mandate, while any separate dispute for the pre-processing period was left to be examined through the appropriate rectification route.
Conclusion: The adjustment was not validly established, and the assessee was entitled to the refund of Rs. 1,17,184 with consequential statutory interest in accordance with law.