Business loss for irrecoverable trade advances allowed where the amount arose directly from trading transactions and was not a bad debt.

Irrecoverable advances made in the ordinary course of trading transactions against supply of goods can be deductible as a business loss when the non-recovery arises directly from the assessee's business operations. Even if the claim does not satisfy the statutory conditions for bad debt under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2)(i), the loss remains allowable where it is commercially connected to the trading activity. The stated position is supported by Gujarat High Court authority and treats such unrecovered advances as a loss incidental to business under section 28(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---

---

Issues: Whether advances made in the course of business against supply of goods, which became irrecoverable, were deductible as a business loss even though they did not qualify as bad debt under section 36(1)(vii) read with section 36(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The advances were made in the ordinary course of trading transactions against supply of goods, and their non-recovery arose from the business dealings of the assessee. Although the claim did not fall within the statutory conditions for allowance as bad debt, the loss was directly connected with the business carried on by the assessee and represented a commercial loss suffered in the course of business. The view taken by the appellate authority was supported by the cited Gujarat High Court decisions.

Conclusion: The claim was allowable as a business loss under section 28(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the disallowance was rightly deleted.

Ratio Decidendi: Irrecoverable advances made in the course of business against supply of goods, though not deductible as bad debt, are allowable as business loss if they are directly connected with the trading operations of the assessee.

---