1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT upholds CIT (Appeals) ruling, assessees' 80J relief qualifies for benefits under section 80K</h1> The ITAT Ahmedabad-B confirmed the CIT (Appeals) order in favor of the assessee, ruling that the ITO wrongly imposed additional income tax under section ... - The ITAT Ahmedabad-B confirmed the order of the CIT (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, stating that the ITO was not justified in levying additional income-tax under section 104 of the IT Act. The assessee's argument that the 80J relief would qualify for benefit under section 80K was accepted, and it was held that the ITO cannot make an order under section 104 in such circumstances. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.