1994 (9) TMI 108 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal, Rejects VATAV Addition, Remits Bidi-Patti Issue for Re-Examination

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions related to vatav and tol-kasar. The Section 68 addition was found unjustified ... - Issues Involved:1. Addition of Rs. 10,01,385 on account of receipt of vatav (discount).2. Addition of Rs. 3,37,457 on account of tol-kasar (extra weight).3. Addition of Rs. 4,50,096 under Section 68 of the IT Act, 1961.4. Addition of Rs. 1,35,925 on account of extra bidi-patti sale.5. Addition of Rs. 63,219 towards extra tobacco sale.6. Deduction under Section 80G.7. Charging of interest under Section 215.8. Initiation of penal proceedings under Sections 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(c) of the IT Act.Detailed Analysis:1. Addition of Rs. 10,01,385 on account of receipt of vatav (discount):The Assessing Officer (AO) made this addition based on the statement of one partner, AVP, who admitted to receiving 6% vatav from farmers, corroborated by the statements of four farmers. However, AVP later retracted his statement, claiming it was extracted under threat and torture. The farmers also retracted their statements, denying any vatav given to the assessee-firm. The Tribunal found no independent, clear, cogent, and reliable evidence to support the AO's addition. The Tribunal directed the deletion of this addition.2. Addition of Rs. 3,37,457 on account of tol-kasar (extra weight):Similar to the vatav issue, this addition was based on AVP's statement, which he later retracted. The Tribunal noted the lack of independent evidence to support the AO's addition. The Tribunal emphasized that retractions by AVP and the farmers necessitated independent corroborative evidence, which was absent. The Tribunal directed the deletion of this addition as well.3. Addition of Rs. 4,50,096 under Section 68 of the IT Act, 1961:This addition was made because the AO doubted the ownership or lease of agricultural land holdings from which tobacco was cultivated and sold to the assessee-firm by two partners, SMP and AVP. The AO considered part of the tobacco purchase as unexplained. The Tribunal found this addition unjustified under Section 68, as the AO did not doubt the purchase or sales figures. The Tribunal directed the deletion of this addition.4. Addition of Rs. 1,35,925 on account of extra bidi-patti sale:The Tribunal noted the need for examination of account books, subsidiary registers, purchase and sale invoices, and other connected material to decide on this addition. Due to the lack of access to these materials, the Tribunal remitted the matter back to the AO for re-examination and fresh conclusion after proper enquiry.5. Addition of Rs. 63,219 towards extra tobacco sale:Similar to the bidi-patti sale issue, the Tribunal remitted this matter back to the AO for re-examination, citing the need for examination of relevant data and details.6. Deduction under Section 80G:The Tribunal directed the AO to take evidence on record that the assessee may produce to claim the benefit of Section 80G and process the claim accordingly.7. Charging of interest under Section 215:The Tribunal directed the AO not to charge or levy interest under Section 215 in the fresh assessment without hearing the assessee and giving an opportunity to explain why they are not liable for interest under Sections 215/217.8. Initiation of penal proceedings under Sections 271(1)(c) and 273(2)(c) of the IT Act:The assessee's representative did not press for any decision on this ground, and hence, no decision was given by the Tribunal.Conclusion:The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the deletion of additions related to vatav and tol-kasar, found the Section 68 addition unjustified, and remitted the matters of extra bidi-patti and tobacco sales back to the AO for re-examination. Directions were also given regarding Section 80G deduction and interest under Section 215. No decision was made on the initiation of penal proceedings.