TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Tribunal Upholds Merger of Orders, Limits Revenue's Remedies</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI-II Versus PETPAK PVT. LTD.</h3> The Revenue's appeal against the dropping of part of the duty demand was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appeal was found not maintainable after the ... Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) - Merger Issues:1. Appeal filed by Revenue against dropping part of demand of duty.2. Applicability of Tribunal's Larger Bench decision in LML case.3. Review of original authority's order by jurisdictional Commissioner.Analysis:1. The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the dropping of part of the demand of duty by the original authority for recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the party's appeal, leading to the department's appeal being dismissed on the ground of merger with the Order-in-Appeal No. 154/2002. The impugned order relied on the Tribunal's decision in the case of CCE v. LML Ltd. The key issue was whether the department's appeal was maintainable post the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.2. The main contention raised by the Revenue was the review of the original authority's order by the jurisdictional Commissioner before the Order-in-Appeal No. 154/02 was passed. The appellant argued that the Larger Bench decision in the LML case might not be applicable due to this review. However, the Tribunal found no merit in this argument. It was noted that by the time the department's appeal was taken up by the Commissioner (Appeals), the original authority's order had already been set aside by the appellate authority in the appeal filed by the assessee. Therefore, the order had merged with Order-in-Appeal No. 154/2002, making the Revenue's appeal to the Tribunal not maintainable.3. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal filed by the Revenue against the original authority's order was not maintainable after the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) on 31-10-02. The impugned order was deemed correct, and the appeal was dismissed. The judgment highlighted the importance of the chronology of proceedings and the concept of merger of orders, emphasizing the limited remedies available to the Revenue in such circumstances.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
