Revenue's Appeal Dismissed Due to Delay; Rush of Work Not a Valid Excuse The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue's application to condone a 68-day delay in filing an appeal, citing that rush of work was ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Revenue's Appeal Dismissed Due to Delay; Rush of Work Not a Valid Excuse
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed the Revenue's application to condone a 68-day delay in filing an appeal, citing that rush of work was not a reasonable cause for the delay. As a result, the appeal was also dismissed.
The Revenue's application to condone a 68-day delay in filing an appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi. Rush of work was not considered a reasonable cause for the delay. Consequently, the appeal was also dismissed. (Dictated and pronounced on 12-8-2005)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.