Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether segregation of the insulation and metal from imported cable scrap amounted to jobbing so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 32/97-Cus. read with the Customs (IDCRDMEG) Rules, 1996.
Analysis: The exemption notification granted duty-free import of goods for execution of an export order for jobbing, subject to compliance with the prescribed procedure and re-export of the imported goods and resultant products. The expression "jobbing" in the policy did not require that the activity must culminate in a complete manufactured article; it was sufficient if the importer undertook a part of the process. The appellant separated the outer insulation from the metallic portion of the imported cables and re-exported the resulting products. The record showed compliance with the procedural requirements under the Rules, and the reliance on hazardous-waste material was not relevant to the show cause notice or to the fact that the segregated material was exported.
Conclusion: The activity constituted jobbing and the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Jobbing under the exemption scheme includes a part-process of processing or working upon imported goods, and does not require completion of a manufactured article where the prescribed procedural conditions and re-export requirements are satisfied.