1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants refund with interest based on audit, CA certificate, and eligibility under protest.</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing a refund to be issued within three months with interest. The decision was based on audit balance sheets showing ... Refund - Unjust enrichment Issues involved: Appeal against OIA No. 40/2005-CE for non-compliance with remand directions u/s 694/2001 by Commissioner (Appeals).Summary:1. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to examine evidence thoroughly for refund eligibility based on principles of natural justice within four months.2. Appellant argued non-receipt of duty from M/s. Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd., supported by balance sheet and correspondence, citing precedent for refund entitlement.3. Tribunal disagreed with remand, decided on merits based on audit balance sheets showing excise duty refund receivable, CA certificate, and correspondence indicating duty not reimbursed.4. Affidavit confirmed duty paid under protest, leading to eligibility for refund with consequential relief.5. Appeal allowed, refund to be issued within three months with interest.