Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported second-hand medical equipment imported by an STP unit on a temporary basis required a separate licence under the Import-Export Policy, and whether confiscation, fine and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: Para 6.3 of the 2002-2007 Import-Export Policy permitted import of second-hand capital goods, and para 6.2(b) allowed an STP unit to import, without payment of duty, all types of goods including capital goods as defined in the policy. On that construction, the goods could not be treated as requiring a separate licence merely because they were second-hand. The confiscation rested on a misreading of the relevant policy provisions, and once confiscation was unsustainable, the consequential fine and penalty also could not survive.
Conclusion: The licensing objection failed, the confiscation was set aside, and the fine and penalty were held to be not leviable.