Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on capital goods could be denied merely because the goods were sold to a finance company and taken back on lease while remaining installed and used in the factory.
Analysis: The capital goods had been installed in the factory and were not physically removed. The finance arrangement was entered into only to recover the cost of the capital goods, and the goods continued to be used in manufacture. Notification No. 27/94-C.E. (N.T.) dated 17-6-1994 permitted credit in respect of capital goods acquired on lease, hire-purchase or loan agreement from a finance company. In these circumstances, denial of credit was not justified.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was incorrect and the assessee was entitled to the credit.