Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand raised under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules was sustainable after the appellant reversed the entire credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of purified water that was captively consumed and partly cleared without payment of duty.
Analysis: The demand was founded on the use of common inputs in exempt goods. The appellant had reversed the full Modvat credit attributable to the inputs used in the manufacture of purified water. The Tribunal applied the settled position that, under the Modvat scheme, reversal of credit taken in excess of what is due satisfies the requirement of law and that the timing of such reversal is not material. On that basis, the earlier view was followed and the demand was held unsustainable.
Conclusion: The demand under Rule 57CC was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.