Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether naphtha used as fuel for generating steam and electricity, where the electricity was partly consumed within the factory and partly supplied outside, qualified as an 'input' for duty credit under Rule 57AA(d) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The definition of 'input' under Rule 57AA(d) was treated as materially pari materia with the earlier Rule 57B(1). The definition separately recognises 'goods used as fuel' and 'goods used for generation of electricity or steam', and the latter expression was read as excluding fuel already covered by the earlier clause. Since naphtha was admittedly used as fuel within the factory, its eligibility for credit was not defeated by the manner in which the electricity generated from it was ultimately used. The broader Modvat scheme and the analogy with exemption notifications were held to be of no assistance to the Revenue.
Conclusion: Naphtha was eligible for input duty credit as 'goods used as fuel' under Rule 57AA(d), and the disallowance of Modvat credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute separately recognises 'goods used as fuel' and 'goods used for generation of electricity or steam', fuel falls within the former category and its credit eligibility is not negated merely because the electricity generated from it is not wholly consumed within the factory.