Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to Cenvat credit on iron and steel items used in the manufacture of capital goods installed in the factory.
Analysis: The credit claim was examined with reference to Rule 2(g) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and Explanation (2), under which inputs include goods used in the manufacture of capital goods that are further used in the manufacturer's factory. The iron and steel items were used to manufacture capital goods such as kiln, material handling unit, hopper and pollution control system, and there was no dispute on such use. The fact that the capital goods were attached to the earth or were not themselves excisable goods was held to be immaterial so long as the inputs were used in capital goods that were in turn used for manufacture of the final product. Credit already reversed on items used for structural or construction purposes was noted.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to Cenvat credit on the disputed inputs and denial of credit was not sustainable.