Rule 57CC compliance for exempted goods remains mandatory despite no express recovery clause

Rule 57CC required a manufacturer clearing exempted final products to either pay an amount equal to 8% of the sale price of such goods or maintain separate inventory and accounts for inputs used in their manufacture and forgo Modvat credit on those inputs. The absence of a specific recovery provision did not dilute that substantive obligation. Modvat credit operates as a set-off against duty on dutiable products, so credit could not be retained for exempted goods without compliance. The demand was therefore sustainable and the appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was bound to pay 8% of the price of exempted final products under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 despite the absence of a specific recovery provision, and whether non-maintenance of separate inventory and accounts under the rule could excuse compliance.

Analysis: Rule 57CC imposed a clear obligation on a manufacturer clearing exempted final products to either pay an amount equal to 8% of the sale price of such goods or maintain separate inventory and accounts of inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods and refrain from taking credit on such inputs. The availability or absence of a supplementary recovery mechanism did not dilute the substantive obligation created by the rule. Since Modvat credit is intended as a set-off against duty payable on dutiable final products, credit could not be retained and utilized for exempted goods without compliance with the rule.

Conclusion: The appellant was required to comply with Rule 57CC, and the demand was sustainable. The appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where exempted final products are manufactured using credit-availing inputs, compliance with the substantive options under Rule 57CC is mandatory, and the absence of an express recovery provision does not negate the liability to pay the prescribed amount or to maintain separate inventory and forego credit.

---