Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a declaration of concealed income made after a search and seizure during the relevant previous year could be accepted under section 3 of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income and Wealth Act, 1976, or was confined to the special regime of section 14.
Analysis: Section 3 granted concessional treatment for voluntary declarations of income chargeable to tax for specified assessment years, but section 3(2) excluded declarations relating to income for a previous year in which books, money, bullion, jewellery, or other valuable articles had been seized in a search under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as well as income of earlier previous years. The exclusion was held to be substantive and not merely provisory. A declaration made after seizure was not treated as a truly voluntary disclosure because the seizure itself exposed the concealment. The Court held that such cases fell within section 14, which specifically dealt with declarations where seizure had already occurred and granted only the limited benefits provided thereunder.
Conclusion: The declaration was not admissible under section 3 and was rightly rejected; the case was governed by section 14, and the decision stood in favour of the Revenue.