1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Classification of Ayurvedic Products: Tribunal Decides on Excise Tariff Act for Medicines vs. Cosmetics</h1> The Tribunal classified Ayurvedic products under the Central Excise Tariff Act, determining Jyotishmathi Taila, Bhringamalaka Taila, and Sukumara Taila as ... Ayurvedic medicament Issues: Classification of Ayurvedic products under Central Excise Tariff ActDetailed Analysis:1. Issue of Classification: The case involved the classification of Ayurvedic medicines, cosmetics, and toilet preparations under Chapter 30 & 33 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute arose when the products were reclassified by the Assistant Commissioner, leading to a demand for differential duty based on the reclassification.2. Original Authority's Decision: The original authority reclassified the products under Chapter 33, citing Note 1(d) of Chapter 30, which excludes goods of Chapter 33 from Chapter 30 classification. The authority considered products like Neelakeshaposhini and Jyotishmathi Taila as cosmetics for hair use and Sukumara Taila and Bhringamalaka Taila as bath oils, confirming duty for the said period.3. Commissioner's Decision: On appeal, the Commissioner classified the products under Chapter 3000.39 and 3003.31 as Ayurvedic medicine, setting aside the reclassification under Chapter 33. The Commissioner emphasized that for a product to be classified as Ayurvedic Medicine, it should be known as such and have ingredients mentioned in authentic Ayurvedic books.4. Arguments by Revenue: The Revenue contended that the items were cosmetics and not Ayurvedic Medicaments, as claimed by the assessee. They argued that the primary character of the goods was taila, and they fell under the exclusion specified in Note 1(d) of Chapter 30, classifiable under Chapter 33.5. Legal Precedents: Various legal precedents were cited by both parties, including judgments on products used for skin or hair care, massage oils, and herbal preparations. These cases highlighted the distinction between cosmetic and medicinal products based on their therapeutic, prophylactic, or curative value.6. Final Decision: After considering all arguments and legal precedents, the Tribunal concluded that products with therapeutic and prophylactic uses for treating ailments should be classified as Ayurvedic medicaments. Accordingly, Jyotishmathi Taila, Bhringamalaka Taila, and Sukumara Taila were classified as Ayurvedic medicines under Chapter 3003.39 and 3003.31. However, Neelakeshaposhini was categorized as a cosmetic preparation under Heading 3305.99. The Commissioner's order was upheld for the three items, while the classification for Neelakeshaposhini was modified.This detailed analysis outlines the classification dispute regarding Ayurvedic products under the Central Excise Tariff Act, emphasizing the criteria for distinguishing between cosmetics and Ayurvedic medicines based on their properties and intended use.