Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on the humidification plant and its components was admissible as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, despite the Revenue's claim that the goods were classifiable under an excluded tariff heading.
Analysis: The goods had been assessed by the Customs House under Headings 84.45 and 84.79 of the Customs Tariff, and that assessment had not been challenged. The classification accepted at the import stage could not be altered by the Central Excise authorities at the receiver's end. Since Headings 84.45 and 84.79 were not excluded from the definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q, the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible and the Revenue's objection failed.