Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether technical know-how fee paid under an earlier collaboration agreement was includible in the assessable value of imported parts of furnace and heating equipment under Rule 9(1)(c) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.
Analysis: The imported goods were only parts used in the manufacture of a medium frequency induction furnace, while the technical know-how payment related to transfer of technology for indigenous manufacture. The earlier collaboration agreements had expired before the relevant import period, and the record did not show any subsisting arrangement making the payment a condition of sale of the imported goods. In the absence of a demonstrated nexus between the fee and the imported components, the fee could not be added to the import value.
Conclusion: The technical know-how fee was not includible in the assessable value, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A technical know-how payment is not includible in the assessable value of imported goods unless it is shown to be linked to the imported goods and to form a condition of their sale.