Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether duty of central excise was payable on waste and scrap arising from capital goods cleared by the manufacturer after availing Modvat credit; (ii) whether penalty was imposable in the facts of the case.
Issue (i): whether duty of central excise was payable on waste and scrap arising from capital goods cleared by the manufacturer after availing Modvat credit.
Analysis: The relevant rule provided that where capital goods are sold as waste and scrap, the manufacturer is liable to pay the duty leviable on such waste and scrap. The availment of Modvat credit showed that the capital goods had been used in the manufacture of the final product, and the liability under the rule was not dependent on waste and scrap arising in the course of manufacture of the final product. A manufacturer who takes the benefit of the rule must also comply with its conditions.
Conclusion: Duty was payable on the waste and scrap of the capital goods, and the Revenue succeeded on this issue.
Issue (ii): whether penalty was imposable in the facts of the case.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the interpretation of the relevant rule governing duty on waste and scrap of capital goods. In such circumstances, penal consequence was not justified.
Conclusion: Penalty was not imposable.
Final Conclusion: The demand of duty on waste and scrap was sustained, but the penalty was set aside, resulting in a partial success for the Revenue.