Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether samples drawn from batches of medicines for quality control and marketability testing were liable to excise duty, and whether the related penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The samples were drawn only for testing whether the goods had attained the stage of marketability and the assessee maintained records of such samples. The duty demand on those samples was therefore not sustainable. Since the penalty was composite and also rested on the sample clearances, it required reduction, while the admitted duty liability on shortage of inputs was not in dispute.
Conclusion: The duty demand on quality control samples was set aside. The penalty was reduced and the penalty on the individual appellant was also set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Samples drawn and used within the factory solely for quality control or marketability testing are not liable to excise duty when their use and handling are duly recorded.