Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods imported under a transferable DEEC licence could be cleared when the licence was valid at the time of shipment and filing of the Bill of Entry, even though it had lapsed by the time of clearance from bond.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that the controversy was already settled by earlier decisions and therefore was no longer res integra. It noted that Notification No. 31/97-Cus. contemplated coverage of the imported materials by a valid DEEC licence and that the relevant requirement was satisfaction of validity at the time of shipment and filing of the Bill of Entry. The Tribunal further treated the licence as relating to the goods and accepted that the expression of import could include a person claiming on behalf of the importer.
Conclusion: The objection based on lapse of the licence at the time of clearance from bond was rejected, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a transferable DEEC licence is valid at the time of shipment and filing of the Bill of Entry, subsequent lapse before bond clearance does not defeat the benefit of the exemption notification if the imported goods were otherwise covered by the licence.