Customs valuation enhancement fails when market enquiries are undisclosed and valuation rules are not properly followed.

Declared value under Section 14 of the Customs Act and the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988 could be rejected only by following the prescribed valuation sequence and with fair disclosure of the material relied upon. Enhancement based on undisclosed market enquiries, without supplying the enquiry report for rebuttal and without showing comparable or identical imports, was not sustainable. A valuation worked backwards from an assumed retail price under Rule 8, supported only by a vague reference to market enquiries and an importer's earlier statement, could not be upheld without proper application of the rules and observance of fair procedure.

---

---

Issues: Whether the enhancement of the assessable value of the imported goods could be sustained when the department relied on market enquiries and the importer's statement without supplying the enquiry material and without following the prescribed valuation sequence.

Analysis: The declared value could be rejected only in accordance with the valuation framework under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the Customs (Valuation) Rules, 1988. The record showed that the original authority moved to Rule 8 after stating that no identical or comparable imports were available and after relying on market enquiries to work backwards from an assumed retail price. However, there was no indication that the market enquiry report was furnished to the importer for rebuttal, nor was the material available for scrutiny. A valuation enhancement founded only on a vague reference to market enquiries and on the importer's earlier statement, without disclosure of the basis and without observance of fair procedure, could not be upheld.

Conclusion: The enhancement of value and the consequential duty demand were not sustainable, and the appeal succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Assessable value cannot be enhanced on the basis of undisclosed market enquiries or uncorroborated statements unless the valuation rules are properly applied and the affected party is given a fair opportunity to contest the material relied upon.

---