Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether components used in a high pressure boiler were eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, notwithstanding that the boiler generated steam, part of which was used for generation of electricity that was not wholly captively consumed in the factory.
Analysis: During the material period, eligibility under Rule 57Q depended on the tariff classification of the capital goods. The boiler was treated as classifiable under Heading 84.02 of the CETA Schedule and was covered by the relevant table to Rule 57Q. The disputed items were used as components of that boiler and thus fell within the entry covering components, spares and accessories of eligible capital goods. The proposed denial rested only on the subsequent use of steam and electricity, which did not defeat eligibility once the goods satisfied the Rule 57Q classification requirement.
Conclusion: The components were eligible for Modvat credit, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where capital goods satisfy the tariff-based eligibility criteria under Rule 57Q, their components are entitled to Modvat credit, and credit cannot be denied merely because the goods are used in a process that indirectly results in generation of electricity partly not captively consumed.