Tribunal Modifies Duty and Penalty for Appellant-Firm: Upholds Partial Duty, Reduces Penalty, Sets Aside Double Recovery.

The Tribunal upheld the duty of Rs. 1,85,792/- for goods cleared through challans 1 to 16, as admitted by the appellant-firm, but set aside the duty for goods on challans 17 to 27, cleared by other firms. The demand of Rs. 90,224/- for non-accountal of raw materials was also set aside, as double recovery was impermissible. The penalty on the appellant-firm was reduced to Rs. 30,000, while the penalty on the partner was set aside. The duty amounts were to be re-quantified, and the appellants were directed to pay accordingly. Appeals were disposed of with modifications to the impugned order.

---

---

Issues involved: Confirmation of duty on clandestine removal of goods, non-accountal of raw materials, and penalty imposition.

Clandestine removal of goods:
The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed duties of Rs. 1,85,792/- and Rs. 73,277/- for removal of goods without payment of duty. The appellants contested the duty of Rs. 1,85,792/- based on challans, admitting only up to Sl. Nos. 1 to 16. It was argued that challans 17 to 27 belonged to other firms. The Tribunal found that the goods on challans 17 to 27 were cleared by other firms, not the appellants. Thus, duty for goods cleared through these challans could not be confirmed against the appellants. Duty for goods cleared through challans 1 to 16 was upheld as admitted by the partner of the appellant-firm.

Non-accountal of raw materials:
A demand of Rs. 90,224/- was made for raw materials found short, allegedly used in manufacturing final products removed clandestinely. The Tribunal held that since duty was already demanded on the final products, recovering double duty was not permissible. The demand was related to Modvat credit availed on the raw materials found short. The Tribunal accepted the argument that once duty was confirmed on the final products, the Modvat credit amount could not be recovered from the appellants. The duty confirmation of Rs. 90,224/- was set aside.

Penalty imposition:
The penalty on the appellant-firm was reduced to Rs. 30,000, considering the facts and circumstances of the case. However, the penalty on appellant No. 2, partner of the appellant-firm, was set aside. The duty amounts were to be re-quantified, and the appellants were directed to pay accordingly. The appeals of the appellants were disposed of in light of the modifications made to the impugned order.

---