Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on LDO was deniable on the ground that part of the output stream was used to produce exempted Sulphuric Acid.
Analysis: The credit was availed on LDO used in the smelting operations for manufacture of zinc and lead, while Sulphur Di-oxide emerged as a by-product in that process and was subsequently converted into Sulphuric Acid. Rule 57D(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, protected credit from being denied merely because part of the inputs was contained in a by-product, even if the by-product was exempt. The fact that Sulphur Di-oxide was consciously routed to the Sulphuric Acid Plant did not establish that LDO itself was used in the manufacture of the exempt product. Rule 57C was therefore not attracted, because the inputs were not used in the manufacture of the exempted Sulphuric Acid in the sense required by that rule.
Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied or proportionately reversed on the ground that Sulphuric Acid, obtained from the by-product stream, was exempt from duty.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on inputs used in the manufacture of the principal dutiable product cannot be denied merely because a by-product arising in that process is further converted into an exempt product, where the input itself is not used in the manufacture of the exempt product and Rule 57D(1) protects credit in respect of by-products.