Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment was barred by limitation and whether the case fell within the concealment provisions so as to permit action beyond the prescribed period.
Analysis: The Tribunal and the High Court found that no finding of concealment had been recorded and no material had been brought on record within the relevant four-year period to attract the concealment provision under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, corresponding to section 28(1)(c) of the old Act. On the facts, the assessment was held to be beyond time.
Conclusion: The limitation objection succeeded and the assessment was held to be time-barred.
Ratio Decidendi: Where concealment is not found and no supporting material is recorded within the statutory period, the concealment provision cannot be invoked to defeat the bar of limitation.