Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the settled position that levy of interest under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 implied grant of time up to the date of filing of the return, the question of reference on penalty under section 271(1)(a) survived for consideration.
Analysis: The agreed position between the parties was that the answer to the first question was against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee on the authority applied by the Court. Once the Income-tax Officer was deemed to have granted time up to the date of filing of the return, the basis for levy of penalty for failure to furnish the return within time did not survive. In that situation, attempting to refer the third question in isolation was held to be meaningless.
Conclusion: The proposed reference was unnecessary and the appeals were dismissed.