Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty demand under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules was sustainable when the assessee had reversed the Modvat credit attributable to inputs used in exempted final products.
Analysis: The assessee had already reversed the credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods by debit entries in RG-23A Part-II. Once such credit was reversed, the inputs could not be treated as having continued credit availment for exempted final products. The cited circular and decisions supported the view that, for the relevant period, recovery under Rule 57CC was not attracted in such circumstances.
Conclusion: The duty demand was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was annulled and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where credit attributable to inputs used in exempted goods has been reversed, a demand premised on continued availment of such credit under Rule 57CC cannot be sustained for the relevant period.