Customs exemption for software-development equipment depends on use in the development process, and later duty demands may still be timely.

Imported equipment used in software development qualified for customs exemption only where the goods were capital goods or accessories used within the unit in connection with software development for export. On the facts, items such as video conferencing equipment, desktop video cameras, LCD projectors, EPABX systems, surveillance systems, and security or access control systems were treated as necessary for consultation, testing, secrecy, and data protection in the development process, supported by the essentiality certificate, so exemption was available for those items. The demand was also not defeated by delay because imports were made under bond and the authorities could later verify compliance with exemption conditions; the show cause notices were therefore within time.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the imported equipments used for software development were entitled to exemption under the relevant customs exemption notifications; (ii) whether the show cause notices demanding duty were time-barred.

Issue (i): Whether the imported equipments used for software development were entitled to exemption under the relevant customs exemption notifications.

Analysis: The exemption notifications required the goods to be capital goods or accessories and to be used within the unit in connection with manufacture or development of software for export. On the facts, video conferencing equipment, desk top video camera, LCD projector, EPABX systems, surveillance systems, and security/access control systems were held to be necessary for consultations, discussions, testing, secrecy, and protection of data in the software development process. The essentiality certificate and the nature of the software development activity supported the claim for exemption for those items.

Conclusion: The exemption was available to the specified equipments and the demand on those items was not sustainable.

Issue (ii): Whether the show cause notices demanding duty were time-barred.

Analysis: The goods had been imported under bond for software export purposes, and the authorities retained the power to verify continuing compliance with the exemption conditions. Where goods imported duty-free are later found not to satisfy the conditions of the notification, the demand is not defeated merely because the notices were issued later. The notices were therefore held to be within time.

Conclusion: The show cause notices were not time-barred.

Final Conclusion: Relief was granted only in respect of the listed equipments found eligible for exemption, while the remaining demands were sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods imported under an exemption notification for software development qualify only if they are shown to be used in connection with the software development process, and the revenue may demand duty later where exemption conditions are found not to have been satisfied.

---