Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declared transaction value and year of manufacture of imported second-hand machinery were liable to be accepted, and whether confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act could be sustained.
Analysis: The importer supported the declared value and year of manufacture with a foreign supplier's Chartered Engineer's certificate. The certificate was not shown to be false, fraudulent, or irrelevant, and it specifically certified the manufacturing year, the reasonable second-hand value, and the residual life of the machinery. The rejection of that evidence merely on the basis of a subsequent domestic expert opinion was held unjustified, particularly when the goods had been sourced from a dealer and not from a manufacturer. The market enquiry undertaken by the department also did not displace the declared value. Applying the earlier view on similar facts, the Tribunal held that the certificate-backed transaction value could not be discarded without sufficient independent reason.
Conclusion: The declared year of manufacture and transaction value were accepted for assessment under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. As there was no misdeclaration, the confiscation order and penalty were unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of cogent independent reason to reject it, a bona fide Chartered Engineer's certificate supporting the declared value of second-hand imported machinery cannot be displaced merely by a contrary subsequent expert opinion.