Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tetrapodes fabricated at a site procured and approved for the work, though located away from the breakwater, were manufactured at site so as to qualify for exemption under the relevant excise notifications.
Analysis: The notifications exempt goods falling under Chapter Heading 68.07 when manufactured at site for use in the construction work. The Board's circular clarified that "site" is not to be given a restrictive meaning and may include premises made available for the fabrication work by specific mention in the contract, provided the goods are used solely in that construction. The goods were admittedly used only for the Veraval Port work, and the fabrication premises had been approved and facilitated by the principal. In these circumstances, the site could not be treated as outside the scope of the exemption merely because it was hired by the contractor and was not the exact place of installation.
Conclusion: The tetrapodes were manufactured at site within the meaning of the notifications and the exemption was available to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For goods covered by the exemption notifications, a fabrication premises approved or made available for the construction work constitutes the "site" if the goods manufactured there are used solely in that construction.