Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported product "Dant Mukta" was correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 33.06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, instead of Heading 3003.39.
Analysis: The product was found to be identical in substance and use to "Dant Shakti", the same kind of preparation earlier held classifiable under Heading 3306. The earlier Tribunal view, supported by the principle that tariff classification of goods is to be determined by their popular or common understanding and by the actual use and nature of the product, was followed. No new facts were brought to justify a different view, and the record also showed that the goods were understood as tooth powder and used as raw material for Lal Dant Manjan.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable under Chapter Heading 33.06 and not under Heading 3003.39, and the Revenue's challenge failed.