Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the benefit of nil rate of duty on paper products as newsprint from the date of its application for inclusion in Schedule I of the Newsprint Control Order, 1962, and whether the penalty could survive in view of the same.
Analysis: The definition of newsprint under Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 48 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, read with Notification No. 23/98-C.E., required manufacture by a unit specified in Schedule I of the Newsprint Control Order, 1962. The application for inclusion in Schedule I had been made on 23-12-1999, and the subsequent registration was only a formal culmination of that process. Applying the principle that exemption provisions should receive a liberal construction where consistent with the notification, the benefit was held to accrue from the date of application, not merely from the date of the eventual notification. In view of that finding, the duty liability required recomputation for the period prior to 23-12-1999, and the penalty was no longer justified.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the nil rate of duty from 23-12-1999, the matter was remitted for fresh computation of duty for the prior period, and the penalty was set aside.