Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the CT-2 Certificate issued on 9-3-2000 operated from the date of the application on 3-3-2000 so as to make the tyres and tubes received during 4-3-2000 to 9-3-2000 eligible for exemption from Special Excise Duty under Notification No. 6/2000-C.E., and consequently refundable.
Analysis: The Certificate was issued pursuant to an application made before the disputed clearances, and the Chapter X procedure was treated as having been complied with from the date of application. The Court followed the view that such permission or registration relates back to the date of application, and distinguished the contrary precedent on the ground that it involved a factual finding of non-compliance with Chapter X procedure. On that basis, the disputed clearances were held to qualify for the exemption.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption from Special Excise Duty for the relevant period and to refund of the duty paid, subject to proof that the incidence of duty had not been passed on to another person.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory certificate or permission required for availing an exemption is granted on an application already made, and the procedure is otherwise complied with, the benefit may relate back to the date of application for the purpose of the exemption.