Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transfer of goods by one unit of the assessee to another unit of the same company for further conversion could be treated as a sale, and whether such transfers were liable to be valued at 115% of the cost of production under the Central Excise Valuation Rules.
Analysis: The transfer of goods to another unit of the same assessee was covered by the Board's clarification in Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX. dated 1-7-2002. The circular, read with Rule 8 and the proviso to Rule 9 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, provided that captively consumed goods and transfers to a sister unit or another factory of the same company were not to be treated as sales and that the assessable value in such cases was to be taken at 115% of the cost of production.
Conclusion: The transfer was not a sale, and valuation had to be made at 115% of the cost of production. The appeal was therefore allowed and the impugned order was set aside.