Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax retained by the assessee under the Haryana deferment scheme and converted into capital subsidy was deductible from assessable value as sales tax actually paid or actually payable under the excise valuation provision.
Analysis: The relevant State scheme operated under the deferment mechanism in Section 25A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1975 and Rule 28C of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975. The arrangement did not amount to a mere conventional sales tax concession under the exemption provisions, but in substance deferred the liability and allowed the assessee to retain an amount equivalent to part of the sales tax as capital subsidy. The net effect was an adjustment of reciprocal liabilities rather than a case where sales tax was never payable. The Board circular on set-off was also treated as supporting the principle that local law entitlement, rather than the form of book adjustment, governs deduction.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to abatement of the sales tax element, and the demand and penalty were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the order confirming duty demand and penalty was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the local sales tax scheme defers tax and converts the deferred amount into capital subsidy, the amount remains legally payable for purposes of excise valuation and is deductible from assessable value as sales tax actually payable.