1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT denies Revenue's stay application, allows early hearing on refund matter, finds no prima facie case</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's stay application on an impugned order, finding the matter arguable but not convinced of a ... Stay application against order allowing refund The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore rejected the Revenue's stay application on an impugned order. The Tribunal found the matter arguable but not convinced of a strong prima facie case for granting stay. The Tribunal allowed an early hearing instead of granting stay, as the impugned order had already been given effect to and refund allowed to the respondents. The Tribunal noted that the provision relating to 'unjust enrichment' introduced in Section 27 cannot apply to refund of export duty under Section 26 of the Customs Act, 1962.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
