Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57A was admissible on inputs used in the manufacture of tools and dies that were fully exempt from duty and used within the factory.
Analysis: The tools and dies were held to be final products and not intermediate goods, as they did not form part of or get incorporated into the finished excisable goods. They were used only as aids in the manufacturing process and were in the nature of capital goods. Since the claim was made as input credit under Rule 57A, and the goods manufactured from the inputs were exempt under Notification No. 67/95-C.E., the credit was not allowable. The inputs were also not shown to be parts, components, spares, or accessories of capital goods.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was correct and the issue was decided against the assessee.